![]() |
| image |
I guess that unless you've been living under a rock (or, I'm betting if you're my husband -let me check- yep, this is the first he's heard of it. Honestly, does the man never listen to the radio?), you've heard all about the movement provocatively named "Slutwalk".
For those of you that have missed it (I'm doubting there are many), earlier this year,a couple of officers in the Toronto Police force were holding an information night on Campus safety at a local university. And one of the safety tips given by an officer was that if women didn't want to be victims of sexual assault, they shouldn't dress like sluts.
Cue a LOT of offended people. And probably rightly so. It's disheartening to realise it's 2011 and the police force (and let's not fool ourselves into thinking that this attitde is limited to just a)the Toronto Police force or b) just law enforcement in general) still, deep down, believe that somehow women are at least partly to blame for sexual assault.
According to organisers, the idea was to highlight a culture in which the victim rather than rapist or abuser is blamed. Walks have been held all over the world, beginning in Canada and the United States, and in a groundswell, sweeping through other nations, ours included.
According to organisers in Boston "The event is in protest of a culture that we think is too permissive when it comes to rape and sexual assault.
"It's to bring awareness to the shame and degradation women still face for expressing their sexuality... essentially for behaving in a healthy and sexual way,"
And why "Slutwalk"? According the the original organisers, at http://www.slutwalktoronto.com/ -
Historically, the term ‘slut’ has carried a predominantly negative connotation. Aimed at those who are sexually promiscuous, be it for work or pleasure, it has primarily been women who have suffered under the burden of this label. And whether dished out as a serious indictment of one’s character or merely as a flippant insult, the intent behind the word is always to wound, so we’re taking it back. “Slut” is being re-appropriated.
![]() |
| image |
Here's the first part of my concern. I'm not sure that the word 'slut' can (or even should) be 'reappropriated'. I think that there are some pejorative terms that ought to be simply retired. Not accepted, not changed. Banished forever. Nigger. Retard. Faggot. Kike. Slut.
(I apologise if anyone is offended by my typing out the actual words instead of resorting to "the 'N' word' but I didnt' want any confusion, and the "K" word or the "F" word might not have been as obvious).
I think that these are words that are nothing but hurtful. They are dehumanizing words hurled at innocent people with the intent to insult and hurt. And in my opinion, parading on the streets in a bra and your fishnets with the word "Slut" scrawled across your stomach doesn't 'reclaim' the term. At best, it turns you into a spectacle, enabling noone to take you or your message seriously. At worst, it perpetuates the stereotype.
![]() |
| image |
And depending on which one you go to, or which organiser you ask, the whole reasoning behind using the term "Slutwalk" is a little confusing, even contradictory. Some want to claim the world as something to be proud of. "If I want to wear clothes that show of 'the girls' and that makes me a slut, then I'm a slut. And proud of it'. Others say that they want to "take back the word, take away the power people have over us when they use it".
According to writer and commentator Leslie Cannold "Reclaiming the word slut is going to disempower it. Gays have reclaimed the wordqueer and good on them. today the women and men of Melbourne are reclaiming the word slut."
Opinion writer and author of "The Great Feminist Denial", Monica Dux says "Enough of the judgements about our sexuality. Enough of living in a world where we do not feel safe".
Which is it? Are we embracing the word slut and deciding it is something to be proud of? Or are we saying that we shouldn't be judged on our sexuality and don't deserve to be called sluts because of it?
The thing is, that last part of Monica's statement is where my heart truly lies. "Enough of living in a world where we don't feel safe". And I think that this is where the organisers have simply missed the point.
Do I care that a woman can't wear whatever skimpy outfit she wants to a club and be subjected to crude comments and uninvited sexual advances? Sure. While I don't know that it's necessarily advisable to dress that way , I believe a woman deserves the right to wear whatever she wants and be safe.
Do I care that there is still a prevailing attitude that a woman dressed that way who is raped in some way 'had it coming'? More than I can tell you. I believe with every fibre of my being that it is NEVER the woman's fault. I believe that not only does "No mean no". But anything other than a loud, clear and sober "Yes" means no too.
But do I think that this is what feminism really means? No. I don't. I think that the feminism movements and women's rights were about equal rights for women, an end to sex-based discrimination and (in theory at least) an end to exploitation and trafficking of women. It is about promoting women's rights, rights and issues. The right to vote. the right to hold public office. The right to purchase a home. The right to an education. The right to have a voice. The right to apply for and be paid equally for the same job as anyone else and not be discriminated against based upon gender.
From here
The feminist movement (also known as the Women's Movement, Women's Liberation, or Women's Lib) refers to a series of campaigns for reforms on issues such as reproductive rights, domestic violence, maternity leave, equal pay, women's suffrage, sexual harassment and sexual violence. The movement's priorities vary among nations and communities and range from opposition to female genital cutting in one country or to the glass ceiling in another.
Now, of course, I think that the issue of sexual objectification comes well and truly under the umbrella of the women's movement, or feminism. And of course, I believe it to be a genuinely important, and currently relevant part of it. We are really no closer to winning the fight against the objectification of women, the trafficking and exploitation of women and girls into prostitution than we were 50 years ago. Sometimes I think we're further away than ever.
But it infuriates me a little that it took a dozen or so offended university students being offended (and rightly so) to start this movement. That this is all about what we can and can't wear and who we can and can't sleep with. That those things don't invite sexual assault.
And they don't. And good on you for standing up for what you believe in. The safety of young women in a modern metropolis to safely wear next to nothing and get drunk off her face, safely.
But why is it so hard to get people this passionate* about how women are treated elsewhere? Where in Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Iran, a woman (or a boy) can be (and usually is) brutally punished as an 'adulteress' if she reports a rape.
![]() |
| image |
![]() |
| image |
Why can't you get this worked up about the "corrective rapes" now rampant in South Africa and Zimbabwe, where gays and lesbians are raped (and often murdered) to 'cure' them of their sexual orientation. The latest reported victim is a 13 year old little girl. It is reported that at least 10 women a week are subjected to 'corrective rape' in Cape Town alone. It is said that this practice is now growing more common in schools.
Did you know that the Democratic Republic of the Congo is considered the 'rape capital of the world'? That the prevelance of rape and butchery is so high that it's been said “Sexual violence in Congo reaches a level never reached anywhere else. It is even worse than in Rwanda during the genocide.” Women and children (as young as 5 months old) are raped for months on end and butchered. Those that survive are usually shunned by their families and villages, and so incredibly physically injured that they can never have children again, and need colostomy bags as their reproductive and digestive systems are so badly damaged.
(This video isn't necessarily easy to watch, it is heartbreaking rather than graphic, but these women deserve, if nothing else, our attention and 3 or 4 minutes of our time).
A few months ago, I blogged about my heartbreak at a 4 day mass rape of over 300 women and children in Eastern Congo, just a few kms away from a UN mission.
An article published in the Journal of the American Medical Association estimated at that around 30 percent of women in the eastern Congo are survivors of conflict-related rape.
![]() |
| image |
But please. Open your eyes. Look at the world around you and how horrific it is to be a woman in Africa or the Middle East or the Sub Continent.
Don't march for me. Don't dress in costume and turn this issue into a mockery, declaring it a march for human rights if you can't see the big picture.
March for them.
![]() |
| image |
![]() |
| image |
![]() |
| image |
![]() |
| image |
![]() |
| image |
![]() |
| image |
Fight for them. They need it more than any of us.

39 comments:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)















You get less comments cos you have already said it all, so succinctly, that there is no more words from us.
ReplyDeleteyou still rock tho
I read an article by Catherine Deveny yesterday about this same issue, although focusing on the Slutwalk, rather than the violence against women in Africa.
ReplyDeleteI agreed with the points she made why it was important. I also agree with you about why it is necessary to fight and write about violence against women everywhere.
It is time we not only reclaimed the night, but reclaimed the world. That task seems daunting, but if each of us were to do one little thing, even if that thing is to take part in Slutwalk, then at least something is done. Something is changed. One little thing after another is maybe all some of us can do.
Great post, I'll certainly share it...
Well I have visited your blog a few times but THIS article is the one I feel compelled to comment on.
ReplyDeleteAs a uni student not so long ago I felt that it was my right to dress provocatively and not be 'asking for it" or harassed in any way..I still do BUT now as a mummy, I can see myself cautioning my daughters when they are older on their potential clothing choices due to now wanting them to elicit unwanted attention!
As a woman, I have no desire to reclaim the word "slut" and yet, maybe it would work? Five years ago "bitch" held a lot of negative connotations and now...it's "Hi Bitches!" and it feels kinda good.
What really got me thinking was your references to sexual violence in other parts of the world....how it is often ignored, glossed over or viewed as someone elses ugly problem to deal with.
Insightful, well researched and horrifying on some levels...I'm, not sure what I think yet but you have certainly given me a lot to reflect on.
Thank you!
Very hard to read, but what a wonderful, needed post. I'm not sure about these Slutwalks, the name has certainly turned me off...something different maybe??
ReplyDeleteI tend to reply to everything, but I'm opinionated like that. I get the mild irrits when any issue is ever overtaken by the "they have it worse" part. I think these are two separate but interlinked issues.
ReplyDeleteI think that if in the Western world we can still be pergorative about a woman based on her dress, or if she enjoys her sexuality, to the point that women can endure harrassment or physical assault based on it, that it remains a relevant issue. It's something that women can and do want to stand up and fight for.
I think minimising the harm done by the societal condemnation of female sexuality is extraordinarily harmful, even if they're less likely to be raped and murdered than they would be through parts of sub Sahara.
I don't think that reclaiming the streets in areas that we are holding up as being so much more enlightened negates the sheer overwhelming horror of what is happening in developing and war torn nations. And I'd happily march for both.
I see your point Jenn (and yes, you are one of my best repliers :D), and I did say that I thought they had a right to march for this. I'm not convinced that 'reclaiming' the word slut with do anything positive, but that's just one side of the issue.
ReplyDeleteI'm not saying don't march here because it's worse over there. But I'm frustrated at how easy it was to get this movement off the ground, when it's so hard to get the sexual victimisaion of other women noticed.
Does that make sense?
Fantastic post Melissa.
ReplyDeleteThe Slutwalk debate reminds me of the outrage around the 'uncovered meat' comments made a few years ago; we do need another reminder that these opinions are still around and that they aren't OK. I don't know that marching down the street in your underwear is the way to go about that though. Call me old fashioned...
Violence against women isn't right, anywhere. The reality many African women deal with is horrific; the situations in some countries is beyond comprehension. As women living in a society where we are relatively safe and empowered, we should be doing more about that. That doesn't mean that there aren't things we need to attend to in our own backyard though.
Just commenting to tell you that aim reading, and prefer this much more than the fluff.
ReplyDeleteAfrica is using rape as a weapon. I find it heartbreaking.
Slut walk, I have mixed feelings.
You have said what needs to be said so eloquently Liss. Am off to share on FB right now
ReplyDeleteThis is my first visit to your blog, via a link from Dorothy (Singular Insanity) on Facebook.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your insightful post. I think that the cause of those organising Slutwalk is an important one and well deserving of the passionate support it is receiving, but like you I cringe away from the title they have chosen. I have no desire to 'reclaim' the word slut as a descriptive term to be proud of.
As soneone who has experienced a date rape, I can say that for me the issue is, as you mentioned, the need for women to feel safe no matter what they are wearing or who they are with. I never dressed in a way that could have been described as sluttish, yet I still wasn't safe from abuse. I think that the shock value of using the term 'slut' in this campaign perhaps detracts from the central issue of providing women with an environment in which they are free to express themselves and live without fear of abuse.
As for the plight of the women in DR Congo and similar areas, I spoke once with a midwife who had spent time in the Congo and her stories of the suffering of women there were truly horrifying. It remains one of the great shames of the Western world that we are not doing more to protect these women.
Thank you again for your post. You have expressed so well thoughts that I had twisting about in my own mind.
Excuse my language but - well fucking said.
ReplyDeleteI've heard about these Slutwalks and though i agree that the way a woman dresses speaks absolutely nought for how she wishes to be treated sexually i do think the term "Slutwalk " is ridiculous. Why you would want to reclaim such a repugnant word and use it "proudly " is beyond me.
And i also, like you, could think of dozens of other things, injustices on a far worse scale, that could use a little more recognition...
I get what you're saying Liss. If only we Western women, with all our passion, pride, POWER and dignity, could also look beyond our own issues to bring more attention to the plight of our sisters in developing nations.
ReplyDeletexx
I definitely agree with you. More attention should be given to the plight of other women around the world who suffer rape no matter what it is they're wearing. Where what they wear isn't an issue. While I think the "Slutwalk" is a good way or rather a way to create awareness on giving women in the Western world freedom to wear whatever they want without being judged or raped for that matter, I do think the word "Slut" just isn't appropriate. It's something I don't think we need to reclaim.
ReplyDeleteThe ethos behind the movement is spot on - and depressingly apt. But then it always apt and of the moment. One only has to read the newspaper and watch the news. I agree with you regarding the word 'slut'. It is difficult for words to be re-appropriated. I know people will hold up the word 'gay' as a example but even in today's culture is still means 'lame' to the young. Some words are just too monstrous in their negativity to ever change their spots. Retirement is the better option. The stories here are heartbreaking. Most heartbreaking of all are the millions of other stories that we never get to hear about... the ones that are happening now and will happen tomorrow.
ReplyDeleteYes. I think you've hit the nail on the head for me. It's terribly 'localised' and almost like a 'cool/hip' thing to do so all these movers and shakers have decided to go out and do it. But is it really as global as they'd like to think?
ReplyDeleteWell stated.
Mel I'm a long term reader of your blog but very rarely comment on any blogs. I couldn't read this and not reply.
ReplyDeleteNo woman anywhere in the world should have to endure violence of any form. I think any cause that brings attention to this is can only do good. While yes, I do cringe at the negative connotations from the name 'Slut Walk' I think by using this name it's giving coverage to a movement that may have just been passed over.
like tinkster said, if you've already said it all there are less comments. Polly dolly is much quicker and saying "nice boots" requires less thought than a measured response that this requires. Also, this is the type of post where one might be left with such a sadness at the plight of others that what do you write? What is there to say? There are no words.
ReplyDeleteYou have said it right. I think it is a sad fact of our society though that we quite often. Iss the point because everythingnjas to be politically correct, and no ones feelings should be hurt.
ReplyDeleteWhilst the way women dress is by no way a justification for any kind of sexual abuse, we women need to be aware that men do think differently from us, and are turned on by the sight of flesh. Provocative dressing draws attention. Like i said, it's not an excuse, but I think we need to be mindful of that.
I have met some women from the congo, and although I don't know what it was that happened to them, I know that it was so bad you don't talk about it. These are real people with real faces. Who gives a damn about the word slut? There are broken women out there.
This post has moved me. I have been living under a rock, because I wasn't aware of the atrocities in the Congo. Thank you for opening my eyes.
ReplyDeleteIt does make the Slutwalk seem trivial in comparison, but the organisers have good intentions. They are trying to make a difference.
The use of the word "slut" is attention-getting and has caused the movement to be known worldwide. This exposure gives them a powerful voice. If it changes the attitude of only one person, then that's a good thing right?
Who knows? There is a strong link to the treatment of women worldwide, who's to say that some of these protesting groups won't take up the fight on a broader scale. One can always hope.
What a powerful post!
ReplyDeleteI think you have said it all...and got it all right!
There was a photography exhibition here a couple of years ago titled Never Again, I had to review the exhibition as an assignment. It was about the genocide in Rwanda. The two photographers documented the womens stories as they lived through the genocide. It was very powerful. Your post reminds me of this.
ReplyDeleteAnything that gets people actually talking about rape is a good thing. Whether I agree with the slutwalk or not is irrelevant, the important fact is that there is now a public discourse.
Good post.
Yes yes YES! excellent post Melissa, well thought out and well written.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you entirely about SlutWalk. Having two daughters, I want them to be safe but I certainly wouldn't be happy with them calling themselves 'sluts'! Can we just aim at removing that word from general usage?
Your words and pictures about the Other Women, the forgotten ones, had me in tears. I don't know what it is about their plight that the West won't recognise.
Anyway, I'm putting a link on my blog to yours, if that's OK.
Great post. I agree. (I've written about this myself - waiting to hear if the newspaper will use it - if not, I'll pop it on my blog.) I've attended many feminist gatherings where women in developing countries are never mentioned. Very frustrating.
ReplyDeleteConsider me a new follower!
I really, really wish I could say you were wrong. About any of this post. But I can't. Thank you. It needs to be shouted from the roof tops world wide.
ReplyDeleteTHANK YOU for articulating exactly what I do and don't like about Slutwalk. I started to do a post on it and just... I don't know, abandoned it. Too many complex thoughts to tease out. But you did it so well. So thank you!!
ReplyDeleteAnd I don't know the answer to why we can't muster the same compassion for our sisters and brothers in 3rd world nations that we can for our own. That is one reason I wrote the poem "Women, A History". Because we are truly all one and the same.
I love these posts much more than the fluff, personally. Thanks again. xx
I'm not sure how I feel about this one. On one hand I absolutely believe that the power of words can be turned from negative to positive by the appropriation of those words by those who have been injured by them. It has happened with 'queer' (not gay). It has even happened with 'faggot' and 'nigger' among the communities of people who have been victimised. So why not slut?
ReplyDeleteWhy shouldn't being a slut be seen as something positive? Being free and strong and in charge of your own sexuality? Enjoying sex? Having multiple partners? All the things that women have been judged so negatively for.
So I think it is a conversation that needs to happen. Why shouldn't women take back the word?
And it is inexcusable that any woman is made to feel complicit in her rape or harassment due to the way she chooses to dress. No matter the atrocities occurring here, in the Middle East, in African countries; it still is not okay ever to say or imply that the way a woman dresses contributes to her assault or abuse.
I know you didn't mean this Melissa, and your post was passionate, true and beautifully written as always. But I am very very wary of lessening the seriousness of the inequalities and indignities that women in Australia suffer by comparing them to those of women who's suffering is so much greater. I think it is too often used to shut women up in a 'you should be grateful, look at how bad these women have it' attitude.
We can care about both. Act for both. Be furious and passionate and refuse to accept both.
But I will not be grateful that our society allows me to survive and live relatively freely when so many others cannot. Women deserve equal protection under the law wherever they are, whether it is protection from legal and financial discrimination, as is the case here with women earning a third less than men, or from the terrible physical and spiritual assaults suffered by the women in your post.
Anyway Melissa, you have really made me think and begin to articulate my thoughts. It' s not an easy issue, by any means.
Lyric, I completely get what you're saying. I don't think it's less important that women here are not safe than it is that women overseas are not safe. But I care, so very, very much that so little is done overseas. The DRC alone - 48 women are raped every hour. Every HOUR.
ReplyDeleteThat is one of the worst statistics I've ever heard in my life.
As for the word slut. It's not a positive. And I don't think that it needs to be reclaimed as one. I don't think that being comfortable wtih your sexuality means you have to accept the label. I think it does the reverse. It's ALways going to have negative connotations.
I don't know. Maybe it's me. The disparity between women here and women elsewhere, in 3rd world countries is my 'thing', I guess. And I have nothing to offer but my voice.
And what a beautiful, eloquent voice it is. You could well be right about the word 'slut' too, but I think it is always worth really examining words, our reactions to them and how they might change.
ReplyDeleteIt is so easy to feel helpless in the face of such terrible statistics and turn away. Bless you for not doing so and lending your energy and passion to those who have so few to speak for them.
Young women (teenagers) already call each other slut. And bitch. And cu^t. Have a look at how they talk to each other on FB. It doesn't gain women more respect, or more power. Lesley Cannold said on Q&A last week that she supports reclaiming the word. But I wonder if she would be happy for her sons to call primary school girls sluts. Some words shouldn't be reclaimed. Instead, we could just stop calling each other names.
ReplyDeleteVery true Motherhugger , and I know how this constant talk sounds to me . The word has been reclaimed by the lowest of the low ..and kids think it " Cool " .
DeleteYou will never Gain respect using the word " Slut " , completely unnecessary , and it will never be " Reclaimed".
Okay, here's where you're missing the point.
ReplyDeleteAre we embracing the word slut and deciding it is something to be proud of? Or are we saying that we shouldn't be judged on our sexuality and don't deserve to be called sluts because of it?
The answer? YES.
If we are sexually active and happy about it, then we should be allowed to be proud of ourselves. As long as we are responsible and moral in our dealings, we should be able to have as much or as little sex as we like. The word "slut" gets thrown at women who "like sex too much". What the Jesus? Why is there ANYTHING wrong with that?
And on exactly the same note, if we choose to enjoy an active sex life, possibly with multiple partners, why why WHY should we be judged for that? If the person who gets to call us a "slut" is us, then it's not a term of abuse anymore. THAT is how gays took back the language. I disagree with you that slut is in anywhere near the same ballpark as "nigger" or "faggot". Slut is a PG word, like "bitch". It is reclaimable.
PS. By posting pictures of deeply affected African rape victims you are completely ignoring the issue being discussed. It's heinous, foul, appalling, distressing that there are countries where rape is used as a tool of politics and punishment.
HOWEVER, the SlutWalks are about dealing with the idiots who still haven't caught up with Women's Lib from 40 years ago. Next door might have it worse, but we've still got to try to keep our own house in order.
PPS. Sorry bout the RUDE CAPS, it's just that italic tags are really irritating to type. I don't mean to sound like a crazy shouter.
ReplyDeleteRight. I'm a language scholar (read postgrad editing student) and this "let's stop using the word 'slut'" thing has got me so worked up I just wrote myself a nice blog about it. Please read!
ReplyDeletehttp://glorious-pancake-morning.blogspot.com/2011/06/stop-saying-slut-sorry-thats-not-how.html
So true, and a well timed reminder that while we still have a long way to go on the road to equality here, we need to fight for the roads to be built for women in the 3rd world.
ReplyDeleteBut anything other than a loud, clear and sober "Yes" means no too.
ReplyDeleteThe sober bit is important, and there are way too many people who don't know that.
That's actually why I added the sober, Glowess. It's actually legally important. Not sober = non consensual.
ReplyDeletewow, powerful and well said. my first visit here, I'll be back :)
ReplyDeleteGreat Writing ..Powerful and True .
ReplyDeleteSorry , but the likes of Slutwalk puts the womans movement back 50 years ..Not Sober = Non Consenual ?? = Its called personal responsibility . Its a big wide world out there.
If you are willing to send your 18 Year Old daughter out at Midnight with just tiny pieces of Cloth and uinlimited intoxicating liquor ( and who knows what else ) ..Dont you think you are tempting fate ?
The entire concept of winning back the word " Slut " ..Its already happened with some in our community .Common sense , Self respect , reasonable presentation , responsible use of liquor ..would be a better criteria to Uphold . And " No " its not okey to slap down an " E" and have you little skirt wrapped around your Ears ..SIMPLE really .
Well written ..So very true .
ReplyDeleteThe likes of Slutwalk has put the womens movement back 50 years .
Not Sober = Non consenual ____ What absolute rubbish ! Its called personal responsibility pure and Simple .
Some may be willing to Send there 18 Year OLD daughter out onto the Likes of " King street " wearing a tiny piece of Cloth , and participating in " Pre party shots " , but the best thing you can actually teach her is personal responsibility .
Why do we always want to Blame someone else ? If you drive your car aggressively you a more likely to have an accident . Take Personnal responsibly , dont drink to excess , dont end up with the skirt around your ears lying in the gutter . There is never a need to tempt fate .
Its called common sense , personal responsibility ..and its simply NOT that difficult . Education for both Males and Females is the key ..But , please dont think " I was Drunk " card is a fair play . Each Individual is responsible for their own level of intoxication . Who says you HAVE to drink anyhow ? , this is one area we must work to strip from our Culture .
If you doubt me ... Take a walk down King Street at 5am ..Then tell me you'd be happy if that were your daughter .
EDUCATION , and Common sense . Correct , lets work on real World problems.