We were sitting down to dinner the other night, and once again (like almost every other night), Alexander got a few bites from the end and declared himself done. As he always does, after he's eaten the bits he's liked and left most of the green stuff behind. Problem is, like every other night, I KNEW he would come to me half an hour later, begging for a bowl of cereal because he's starving and he'll just die of hunger if he doesn't get it.
And I found myself about to trot out the old line my (and I'm sure every parent of every one of us of the last 40 years) "There are children in the world who are literally dying because they don't have enough food, and you should appreciate what you have and eat what's on your plate". You remember that line, right? I had it served up to me from the age of about 6 or 7, in the years of the devestating Ethiopian famine.
We all heard it, right? Everytime you didn't finish your dinner (it wasn't just my family, I'm sure of it??). I was young, and not allowed to watch the news. So really, all I saw of it was glimpses of World Vision ads that left me shattered, but not a lot of detail about what was causing the issue. Just that millions of children were dying. I remember the ad that used to say "By the end of this ad, 3 children will have died.." or something to that effect. And I felt physically ill every time I heard it.
And I know it's on my mind a lot right now. The UN has declared famine again in the horn of Africa, with more than 12 and a half million people directly affected by the civil war and drought plaguing the area. It is said that more than 30% of children are acutely malnourished and that a million will die.
Late last week, this image, of 7 month old Kenyan boy Mihag Gedi Farah shocked the world. His mother had traveled for weeks to bring him to the Dadaab aid camp in Kenya, one of the largest (and desperately overstretched) in the world.
Mothers are leaving their children on the road to die, in vain hopes of saving others. Militia is stopping desperately needed food supplies from reaching aid camps, and aid agencies are being forced to pull back, or out, rather than do the invaluable task they came to do.
And I found myself asking how far to take it with Alexander. Now for those who don't know, he's, but compared to a lot of 8 year old boys, probably a young 8. He's got autism, though is high functioning. He's incredibly sensitive. Prone to nightmares and phobias, internalising things and dreaming about them, becoming very afraid of things that are highly unlikely to ever affect him (deathly afraid of tornadoes and volcanoes in our suburb for example). But he's a deep thinker, and gets as indignant as I do about injustice. He simply can't wrap his head around how people treat anyone else in anything other than with love or respect.
So of course, we're careful. Very careful. We avoid watching the news on television (don't get me started on the useless tripe that is commercial news in this country) and I get mine (I'm the wold's worst news junkie, I got it from my mother) almost exclusively online. I don't want him bombarded with images he's not yet able to handle.
But I'm a person who is deeply, passionately aware of what is going on in the world. It's a huge part of who I am (not a popular part, necessarily, but it's there, nonetheless). And as a mother, and a citizen of the world, I want very much to raise children who have a social conscience. Sons who grow up caring about more than what is in their back yard. Who grow up with a knowledge of how incredibly fortunate they are to have been born when they were, where they were. And that makes them entitled to nothing but hopefully gratitude.
Another example was just on Wednesday, on the way to my Retinal Specialist Appt. Alexander was talking about when Captain Cook 'discovered' Australia, and Australia Day being on January 26. And I found myself unable to let it just sit.
I thought it important that he know that in fact, long before Cook sailed these shores, people were already living here. And that British Settlement, (while fortunate for us), wasn't completely the wonderful thing he's been taught. That the British claimed land already owned by the Aboriginal community and that we (for want of a better term) proceeded to treat them appallingly and wipe many of them out. That the date of Australia 26, was to some Australians, not a happy day.
It led to an interesting back and forth about racism and some of our nation's less than proud history. And I was proud of his utter disbelief of how the colour of someone's skin could make anyone feel they had a right or superiority over them. In his opinion "But they were here first. And isn't there room for all of us?"
Obviously, I was careful in my choice of words. But I wanted him to understand that in a lot of lands, ours included, people are treated terribly for no reason other than their gender, the colour of their skin, or their religion. And that it's important that we fight these attitudes with our own tolerance and acceptance.
Now Alexander hasn't seen the photos coming out of Africa. He hasn't seen any of the posts on my blog or any of the videos on YouTube or television.
But my question is this. For those of you with school aged children, when do you start, and with how much information? When did you decide it was important for your children to be aware of the plight of others in the world? Or did you wait for them to bring it up themselves?
I want him to care. I want it to be important to him that life isn't the same for everyone else than it is for him. But of course, I want to be so careful about projecting my own issues onto him, turning him into a mini-crusader who loses the kind of sleep I lose over world issues. I know I have a tendancy to dwell to much. EVERYone who knows me tells me this when I start talking about it. I care too much, when there is so little I can do.
So what do you think? At what age did your children start watching the news with you? At what age did they become aware of droughts and famines? Not the type we have here, but the types where millions and millions are dying? When did they become aware of racism and sexism, discrimination and violence?
How long do we shield them? Where do we draw the line between blissful ignorance and the beginnings of awareness of the world outside of their little box?




My older son was in kindergarten when the bombings happened in London (not long after his 6th birthday). His teacher was visiting her sister in London at the time, so we talked about what had happened and prayed that his teacher would be safe. We talked about how some people felt that they had to hurt other people to get atttention for what they thought was important & how it was never right to hurt others or to think that their lives were less important than ours.
ReplyDeleteMy kids 9aged 7, 10 and 12) are bright and inquisitive. I've tended to shy away from letting them watch the news simply because the images are so graphic at times, but we listen to the radio news in the car. I encourage them to ask questions. we've talked politics, refugees, famine, drought and many other topics. I let their questions direct the detail I go into when we talk about things and obviously I go into more detail with the oldest than I do with the youngest.
This is a really thought provoking post Melissa and the short answer I guess is that it depends on the child and the situation. In saying that our eldest isn't yet 6 and we try to avoid letting him see the news or the like. I think he's far too young to process it and far too young to be worrying about the ways of the world when he has the rest of his life to dwell on these things. I'm not really much help, but you sure have me thinking!
ReplyDeleteI have these conversations with all the kids (well not so much the 3yo) but we try to introduce more details as we feel they're ready for it. The 5yo and I have had convos about Australia Day and about people who don't have enough food to eat but he isn't ready to handle a lot of detail yet so we keep it a bit vague. We want all our kids to understand that they are growing up in privilege and plenty. Like you, we think it's a really important part of our roles as parents. So I guess that there's no age for us but rather a gradual layering of facts. Heck, the 15yo is still very distressed by certain things but we know we can talk it through with him and he'll be able to cope with the reality, some kids might be older before they can cope. I hope this makes sense, 3rd time trying to comment and I am having a bad day! xxx
ReplyDeleteHello Melissa
ReplyDeletejust a quick comment as I am running out the door.
I shielded my child from graphic images till they were about 3.5 > 4.
Then I tried as best as I could to explain, explain, and explain. But then I did find the truth and images helped understanding so much more
I too just showed my child the world vision images - I have spoken about them for a long time and explained I used to sponsor a child prior to my own children.
I believe our children have to be children and have fantasy but there is a time too when they need balance to stop the wanting and need to learn humble, compassion and thanks.
The main thing I shielded my child from is guns, knives and murder on tv shows - not so much the news - we prefer to watch SBS or ABC news if we can anyway.
Have a lovely day Melissa - I could keep going on about this topic :)
x
Loulou
Thought-provoking post, Melissa. I'm guilty of shielding my children from the news. My 11 year old was quite distressed after the floods in Queensland this year so, while she does know about World Vision by chats we've had and what has been said at school, I don't think she is ready for such graphic images.
ReplyDeleteGreat post. Those images are heartbreaking.
ReplyDeleteWe do not watch the news very much in our house.
Mainly because we are too busy but we find it really depressing sitting down to watch what is going on in the world lately. My kids ask me lots of questions and I try my best to explain what is going on. I also try not to give them those type of lines that you mention. It is not their fault these things are happening.
Mostly we talk about how we can be grateful and thankful for what we have instead of blasting them with sad and horrible news images. They very often do not hold back on what they show and you never know what they will show children if they are watching.
It is hard to get the right balance. Still working it out myself. N x
My 4yr old asked me where specifically babies come out from and I told her 'vagina' so I guess I'm not really a shielder.
ReplyDeleteBut in some ways I am.
I want to preserve childhood innocence as long as possible.
I think that feeling powerless is the worst part so maybe helping them feel that they can do something is the best way. With my Guide unit (5-10yr olds) we used to talk about people less fortunate than us but also about ways we could help and then do it.
If your child sees a starving baby on the tv, the best thing you can do is talk it through (and always let them lead the discussion so you're not oversharing things theyre not ready for), discuss ways you can help and then put it into action. Clean family and friends cars for $2 each and donate it to a charity etc.
I always get really emotional seeing those images and realising that we really should be so grateful for what we have.
ReplyDeleteOur eldest is only 5 1/2 so we dont watch the news at all when he's around, I dont think he's at the age where he is ready to understand some of the bad things that happen in the world. I'm happy to let him live in his own little happy bubble and not think about everything else just yet!
I think I've shielded my kids from the real world for far too long that I fear they might end up being ignorant of such issues. I think sometime last year, I showed my kids, a youtube video showing kids in the Philippines eating food that had been thrown out by people from fast food joints. It was sad to see them that way and I think Miss 7 being the more sensitive out of the 3, was affected. In a good way. One thing she did say to me though was - "Mummy, but that's all they ever eat, so they wouldn't know what good food is" - in other words, they wouldn't know what they were missing out on if they've never had it. I didn't know how to react to that. She did understand that she was luckier than them, and that she shouldn't take life for granted, but somehow, I was truly surprised by what she said. And she's only 7.
ReplyDeleteHaving been exposed to the news at a very young age, I think it's all right for my kids to see what's really going on in this world, as long as I explain it to them. I don't want my kids to grow up thinking they live in this big bubble that won't ever burst. And I would love for them to learn some empathy, something that not everyone is born with.
It is such a fine line, isnt it? I dont want my kids to be exposed to things they arent ready for or to lose their innocence too early. But at the same time, I want them to learn things about our world, about people, about how lucky we are living in this country.
ReplyDeleteWe have only ever shielded the kids (3 and 5) from news items that are particularly violent or graphic. Everything else is open for them to watch. We explain explain explain. Watching coverage of the Qld floods and cyclone was a geography and weather lesson, and a lesson in empathy, sharing, and community.
You have really interesting blog, keep up posting such informative posts!
ReplyDelete